photo: Tyler Hardin / RailPictures.net/CSX Transportation; illustrative photo
The U.S. and Germany are rewriting the rules of railway labor negotiations. While CSX’s proactive agreements set a new benchmark in the U.S., Deutsche Bahn’s rapid deal-making has successfully averted strikes in Germany.
The landscape of railway labor relations is evolving on both sides of the Atlantic. In the United States, companies like CSX are pioneering a proactive approach to labor negotiations, securing multi-year contracts ahead of schedule. Meanwhile, Germany has demonstrated remarkable efficiency by reaching agreements swiftly, preventing strikes that once paralyzed its rail system.
Read more
The Baltic states are rewriting their railway future—one track at a time. Lithuania’s LTG Cargo just sent its first EU-standard freight train to Estonia,…
CSX’s Groundbreaking Labor Agreements: A Model for the U.S.?
As The Wall Street Journal reports, CSX Corporation has set a new precedent in the U.S. rail industry by securing tentative five-year agreements with major unions, including the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) and the National Conference of Firemen & Oilers (NCFO). These agreements, covering nearly 60% of CSX’s unionized workforce, include wage increases of approximately 19%, enhanced healthcare benefits, and increased paid time off. CSX CEO Joe Hinrichs, commenting on the matter, stated, "The new tentative agreements strengthen our commitment to creating a workplace where every employee feels valued and empowered while improving safety, efficiency, and service."
Beyond CSX, Trains.com notes that other U.S. rail giants like BNSF, Norfolk Southern, and Canadian National have also reached agreements well ahead of the formal national contract process., marking a shift from the contentious 2019-2022 national bargaining round, which led to a Congressional intervention. However, Union Pacific has yet to finalize similar agreements, indicating that not all railroads are embracing CSX’s approach.
Deutsche Bahn’s Rapid Deal: Efficiency Over Disruption
While the U.S. rail industry moves toward proactive negotiations, Germany’s Deutsche Bahn (DB) has taken a different but equally effective route. After just three rounds of negotiations, DB reached a landmark agreement with the German Railway and Transport Union (EVG), avoiding repeating the disruptive strikes seen in 2024, as previously reported by RAILTARGET.
DB's press release states that the key provisions of the deal include a 6.5% wage increase spread over three years, extended job security until 2027, and improved benefits for shift workers. DB HR Director Martin Seiler hailed the agreement as a "balanced deal that considers both sides during a difficult phase for the company." However, the contract’s 33-month duration has raised concerns among some workers, as it locks in terms until 2028, limiting opportunities for wage renegotiations. Additionally, DB Cargo workers face unique restructuring provisions, allowing for deviations from standard collective agreements.
Avoiding Strikes: A Shared Priority
The motivation behind both CSX’s proactive deals and DB’s rapid agreement is clear: avoid labor strikes and maintain operational stability. The U.S. rail industry is still recovering from the chaotic 2019-2022 contract disputes, which ended with a government-imposed contract to prevent a nationwide rail shutdown, according to uniontrack,com. CSX, BNSF, and others are keen to prevent a similar situation. In Germany, Merkur.de notes that political factors played a role in the urgency of the DB-EVG negotiations. With a federal election on the horizon, both sides wanted to secure a deal before potential government changes could impact railway funding.
Read more
SBB Cargo is to cut 80 jobs by 2025 amid declining freight volumes, with further restructuring plans expected in March.
Lessons Learned: What Can the U.S. and Germany Teach Each Other?
- Proactive Engagement Pays Off – CSX’s strategy of negotiating before contracts expire has led to stable agreements with minimal disruption. Other U.S. railroads and even Deutsche Bahn could benefit from this forward-thinking approach.
- Swift Negotiations Prevent Industry Disruptions – DB’s ability to finalize a deal within three rounds of talks demonstrates that lengthy bargaining processes are not always necessary. The U.S. system, which often involves years of negotiations through the National Carriers Conference Committee, could take cues from this efficiency.
- Long-Term Agreements Provide Stability—But at a Cost – While longer contracts (such as DB’s 33-month deal) provide financial predictability, they limit workers’ ability to renegotiate for better terms if economic conditions change. In contrast, CSX’s five-year agreements ensure higher wage increases but may require mid-term adjustments.
- Balancing Worker Benefits with Operational Efficiency – Both agreements focus on worker benefits, but DB’s restructuring clause for DB Cargo workers raises concerns about job security. The U.S. rail industry faces a similar challenge in balancing workforce satisfaction with operational demands.
With labor negotiations shaping the future of railway operations in both the U.S. and Germany, a hybrid approach combining CSX’s proactivity with Deutsche Bahn’s swift resolution process could be the ideal path forward. For now, the avoidance of strikes in both regions is a major win, but whether these agreements hold up in the face of economic and political shifts remains to be seen.
Source: The Wall Street Journal; Trains.com; RAILTARGET; Deutsche Bahn; uniontrack.com; Merkur.de